ENVI vote postponed once more

ENVICompromising is time consuming business, that’s for sure. And sometimes it’s not easy to reach compromises.

Apparently the ENVI Committee members were not able to reach compromises timely, because the postponed vote on the medical devices regulation proposals that was scheduled for 18 September has now been … postponed, again. The discussion of the regulation proposals is not on the current 18 September agenda anymore and has now been placed on the 25 September meeting’s agenda.

Good news?

This seems very tentatively good news for industry, because it looks like the ENVI members have taken more time to avoid ending up with compromises that will not work for anyone, which is the current rumor. What is really going on is difficult to say because we have no idea what is happening within the committee, who requested the extension and how this extra time may affect the outcome. In any event, if you thought you knew where things were – start rethinking.  Politics are at work here, and the positions seems to be very volatile. It is really difficult to predict which Parliamentary group will support what compromise, and that in a situation where we can only speculate about what’s on the table.

Member states and elections

Compromising is further complicated by the fact that member states have their connections to ‘their’ MEPs and may throw their weight around that way. The compromises I was speculating about push fully on the sore points of the member states, making it doubtful if the dossier will make it in the Parliament in the first reading, which adds considerably to the duration. The late date of the Council meeting on this point (10 December) doesn’t help things, and it seems to become even less likely that the dossier will be finalized before the EU elections.

Stay tuned

Where will we end up? No way to tell at this moment with all the permutations possible. Let’s just hope that the wings are not actually on fire and this dossier makes a nasty crash landing in a compromise that will not help stakeholders except for the politically involved ones.


Navigate through our knowledgebase

Related articles

Article

The Commission and the Council on the MDR state of affairs

The public part of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting on last Monday, 9 December 2019 gave an interesting peek into how the Commission and the Council see…

Read more

Article

Corrigendum 2 and the (potential) consequences for class I devices

Everybody has been in enormous suspense about how the second corrigendum to the MDR and IVDR would turn out. The version that came out of the European Parliament’s ENVI committee vote contains…

Read more

Article

Eudamed delayed, but MDR not delayed – now what?

You may have already heard it from many directions: Eudamed is delayed with two years. Time to party now because you can shelve your MDR implementation project for two years and go…

Read more